Total cost of ownership
License, hosting, specialized talent, and extension maintenance compound. For many merchants the bill grows faster than the product roadmap.
Magento 2 & Adobe Commerce migration
Exit aging Magento 2 or Adobe Commerce when license cost, extension fragility, or release velocity is blocking growth. We migrate catalogs, customers, orders, and integrations onto Medusa.js or Vendure—with phased cutover options, a Next.js storefront, and SEO treated as engineering work.
A Magento 2 or Adobe Commerce migration to Medusa.js or Vendure is a full commerce replatform off the Adobe/Magento monolith onto a modern, API-first Node.js engine. You keep the business rules that still matter—catalog shape, pricing, B2B constraints, integrations—and leave the upgrade theater, extension conflicts, and storefront limits behind. The storefront is typically rebuilt in Next.js; editorial content often moves to Sanity CMS, Contentful, or headless WordPress. It is not a theme swap on Magento, and not a blind export of every module “as-is.”
License, hosting, specialized talent, and extension maintenance compound. For many merchants the bill grows faster than the product roadmap.
Custom modules and marketplace extensions make patch days and major upgrades multi-week projects—or perpetual freezes that accumulate security debt.
Product teams want TypeScript, React, and composable services. Fighting Magento’s monolith to ship a storefront change slows everyone.
GraphQL-on-Magento headless can work, but when the goal is a cleaner commerce core—not a permanent dual stack—Medusa.js or Vendure is the cleaner exit.
Live stores run dozens of custom and third-party modules. We inventory with module:status-style audits and map each capability to keep, replace, or drop.
Custom checkout steps, quote rules, and promotions rarely port 1:1. Behavior is reverse-engineered and rebuilt as testable commerce logic on the target engine.
Magento multi-website, store, and store-view setups need explicit mapping to Medusa/Vendure channels, regions, and storefronts—or a deliberate simplification.
Company structures, shared catalogs, negotiated pricing, and approval workflows need domain modeling—not a flat customer import.
ERP, PIM, OMS, tax, shipping, and payment adapters often assume Magento entities and events. Adapters are redesigned against the new APIs with parity tests.
High-revenue stores rarely flip a switch. We design storefront-first or catalog-first phases so Magento can stay live until the new engine owns cart and checkout.
Scope is fixed after audit. Typical Magento 2 / Adobe Commerce → Medusa.js or Vendure projects cover the following—adjusted for B2B, multi-store, and integration depth.
| Area | What moves |
|---|---|
| Catalog | Products, variants, configurable patterns, categories, attributes, inventory, media, and multi-store catalog differences |
| Customers & B2B | Accounts, addresses, groups/segments, and company/shared-catalog patterns where they still matter on the new platform |
| Orders | Historical orders and statuses for support, reporting, and account history where the target model supports it |
| Pricing & promos | Catalog rules, cart rules, and coupons rebuilt as intentional commerce logic—not unmaintainable Magento rule soup |
| Integrations | ERP, PIM, OMS, payments, tax, shipping, email, and analytics reconnected with queues, errors, and observability |
| SEO & content | URL maps, 301s, metadata, sitemaps; CMS and marketing pages often to Sanity, Contentful, or headless WordPress |
| Storefront | Next.js storefront against Medusa or Vendure APIs—performance, accessibility, and conversion as engineering requirements |
| Cutover | Phased or big-bang launch plans, dual-run options, freeze windows, rollback, and hypercare |
The sequence starts with an honest stay-vs-exit decision, then architecture, ETL, parity, and cutover—with Magento-specific module and multi-store discovery baked in.
Code, modules, hosting, integrations, catalog shape, B2B rules, and SEO surface. Confirm Medusa.js or Vendure is the right move versus staying on Magento Open Source or Adobe Commerce with a rescue engagement.
Choose Medusa.js or Vendure, define storefront and CMS boundaries, map Magento entities to the new domain model, and pick phased vs big-bang cutover with success metrics.
Stand up the commerce engine, import catalog/customers/orders, rebuild critical integrations, and ship the Next.js storefront. Rehearse migrations on staging with production-like Magento exports.
Compare products, carts, tax/shipping, account flows, and edge SKUs against Magento 2 / Adobe Commerce behavior. Validate redirects and metadata for SEO-critical URLs.
Execute the launch plan, monitor orders and errors, support operators, then retire Magento when the new system owns revenue—not when the theme looks finished.
Both are open-source, API-first commerce engines. From Magento 2 or Adobe Commerce, either can be the landing zone; fit depends on catalog complexity, team skills, and how you want to customize after exit.
Modular commerce with a strong TypeScript/React ecosystem and flexible storefronts—commonly Next.js. Often chosen for Magento exits that want composable modules and fast product iteration.
TypeScript-native, GraphQL-first framework with structured admin workflows. Strong when domain modeling, admin UX, and long-term maintainability matter as much as storefront freedom.
Magento stores often carry years of indexed product, category, and CMS URLs—plus multi-store path patterns. A migration that works at checkout but loses rankings is still a failed migration. SEO is planned with the data and route map.
Yes. Magento 2 and Adobe Commerce exits to Medusa.js or Vendure are a core specialty. We inventory modules and extensions, map checkout and catalog logic, migrate catalog/customers/orders, and often phase storefront first so revenue stays stable during cutover.
Sometimes. If license economics still work and the main problem is custom debt or a weak partner, a Magento 2 / Adobe Commerce rescue may be smarter than a replatform. We say so after audit—not from a default “leave Magento” pitch.
They do not transfer. We inventory business value, drop dead weight, and rebuild must-have behavior as Medusa modules, Vendure plugins, storefront logic, or SaaS integrations. Rebuilding every dusty module is how migrations explode in cost.
Yes. Common patterns include a new Next.js storefront against Magento GraphQL first, then moving catalog and checkout to Medusa.js or Vendure, then decommissioning Magento. Dual-run windows are designed around order ownership and inventory truth.
Yes, with explicit modeling. Multi-website catalogs, shared catalogs, company accounts, and negotiated pricing need design choices on the target platform—not a single flat product dump.
Timelines depend on module count, catalog size, B2B rules, integrations, and whether you phase. A focused catalog with standard payments is faster than multi-store B2B with heavy ERP coupling. Estimates follow audit of your real module list.
Share platform edition (Open Source or Adobe Commerce), rough module list, catalog size, and critical integrations. We will push back with the hard scope questions first.
Looking at a different source platform? Browse all migration paths