Security and compliance pressure
Unpatched platforms and shared hosting patterns create risk that legal, insurance, and enterprise buyers will not accept forever.
Legacy ecommerce migration
Older carts, dated PHP platforms, and aging multi-vendor stacks still run real revenue—often with incomplete docs and fragile hosting. We reverse-engineer data models and integrations, clean what must move, and land you on Medusa.js or Vendure without freezing the business for months.
A legacy ecommerce migration moves an aging or poorly documented cart—older PHP platforms, end-of-life suites, multi-vendor stacks, or long-unmaintained systems—onto Medusa.js or Vendure. Discovery is heavier than brand-name migrations: we often reverse-engineer databases, exports, and production behavior when docs and original developers are gone. The goal is a maintainable commerce core and storefront, not a perfect museum copy of every quirk the old system accumulated.
Unpatched platforms and shared hosting patterns create risk that legal, insurance, and enterprise buyers will not accept forever.
Key people left, vendors disappeared, and the cart only “works” because nobody touches it. That is not a strategy—it is a countdown.
New payment methods, markets, or storefront experiences require archaeology instead of product work.
Hosting hacks, manual order processing, and emergency firefighting often cost more than a planned replatform over a multi-year horizon.
Schemas, admin quirks, and nightly jobs may only exist as tribal knowledge. Discovery against the live system is part of the project.
Duplicates, orphan images, broken variants, and inconsistent attributes are common. Cleanup is scoped deliberately so migration is not infinite data science.
Pricing, tax, and shipping may be hardcoded in cron scripts or stored procedures. We extract behavior into testable commerce logic on the new engine.
ERP and shipping connectors may be brittle CSV drops or VPN-only endpoints. Adapters are redesigned for the new platform with clear failure modes.
Legacy routes are rarely clean. We crawl what is indexed, map what earns traffic, and accept intentional redirects where paths cannot be preserved.
Staff who only know the old admin need training and runbooks—or launch day becomes phone support forever.
Scope is discovery-driven. After we understand the source, typical legacy → Medusa.js / Vendure work includes:
| Area | What moves |
|---|---|
| Discovery | Database, export, and admin review; traffic and order-path mapping when docs are missing |
| Catalog cleanup | Products, variants, categories, media—deduped and normalized enough to run a real storefront |
| Customers & orders | Accounts and history needed for support and continuity, with honest limits when source data is incomplete |
| Business rules | Pricing, tax, shipping, and fulfillment rules rebuilt where they still create margin or compliance value |
| Integrations | Payments, ERP, shipping, email, and analytics reconnected with monitoring |
| SEO | Crawl, redirect matrix for high-value URLs, metadata and sitemaps on the new storefront |
| Storefront & admin | Next.js storefront plus operator workflows on Medusa or Vendure admin |
| Cutover | Freeze windows, dual-run options when possible, rollback plan, training, hypercare |
Legacy projects spend more time in discovery and data cleanup than brand-name Magento or Woo migrations—and that is intentional.
Access databases, exports, admin, logs, and hosting. Identify order path, catalog truth, and integration choke points. Document what is unknown.
Choose Medusa.js or Vendure, define storefront/CMS boundaries, and agree what legacy quirks will not be recreated.
Catalog cleanup, ETL pipelines, commerce engine, integrations, and Next.js storefront. Multiple staging import rehearsals.
Checkout, tax/shipping, edge SKUs, and high-traffic SEO URLs validated against the legacy system’s real behavior.
Launch, monitor, train operators, decommission the legacy platform when the new system owns orders and inventory truth.
Either engine can replace a legacy cart. Choice is about how your team wants to build and operate after escape—not about matching the old platform’s UI.
Fits teams that want modular commerce, TypeScript/React delivery, and flexible storefronts after years stuck on an unmaintainable cart.
Fits teams that want GraphQL-first commerce, structured admin, and clean domain modeling after reverse-engineering messy legacy rules.
Legacy sites often have inconsistent URL schemes, soft-404s, and thin category pages. We prioritize protecting URLs that earn traffic and revenue—not cloning every dead parameter combination.
Yes. Legacy and proprietary carts are in scope. We start with a data and integration audit, then ETL, parity testing, and controlled launch—even when documentation is incomplete.
That is common. We reverse-engineer from database schemas, admin behavior, logs, and production traffic. Unknowns are written down early so estimates stay honest.
No—and that is usually good. We migrate what creates revenue, compliance, or operator necessity. Recreating every dusty edge case is how legacy projects fail.
Yes, within a defined scope: duplicates, broken variants, orphan media, and attribute cleanup. Unlimited data remediation is a separate program; we keep migration shippable.
A paid discovery phase establishes data quality, integration complexity, and SEO surface. Build estimates follow discovery—not a generic template day count.
We plan freeze windows, export checkpoints, and rollback where possible. Sometimes dual-run is limited by the legacy system; we design around real constraints, not ideal diagrams.
Share what you know about the platform, hosting, catalog size, and must-keep integrations. Incomplete information is fine—discovery is part of how we start.
Looking at a different source platform? Browse all migration paths